<div dir="ltr">The question becomes though which is the right one to follow the community one or official one. postfix and dovecot community documentation as an example.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Vikram Dhillon <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dhillonv10@gmail.com" target="_blank">dhillonv10@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph<br>
<<a href="mailto:lyz@ubuntu.com">lyz@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Phill Whiteside <<a href="mailto:PhillW@ubuntu.com">PhillW@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> It is precisely because several people new to docs knew or would understand<br>
>> that call, that I issued the call to join ranks and just 'get on with it'.<br>
>> I'd have no idea of how to help as I'm a wiki based person. Others would<br>
>> like to help but there is still confusing instructions. Do we choose and<br>
>> learn what ever docs uses or use what ever manual uses.... a.k.a..... get<br>
>> your acts together and agree on one system :)<br>
>><br>
>> Agree a standard!!!!!!<br>
<br>
> It may seem frustrating to you, but different teams have very good<br>
> reasons for their different tools in their communities. Xubuntu is<br>
> using DocBook because it's a FOSS standard (Ubuntu docs used to be<br>
> written in it), Ubuntu uses Mallard because of their upstream of Gnome<br>
> and the Manual uses LaTeX to ease the on ramp for contributors and<br>
> ability to export it to the formats they need. In each of these<br>
> instances the tools used were selected specifically to suit the pool<br>
> of contributors they had.<br>
><br>
> Hope this helps.<br>
<br>
Phill's reply took me by a surprise since he's an old member of our<br>
docs-family, but as Elizabeth stated, we had to use different tools<br>
due to different standards, however that really shouldn't matter too<br>
much. There aren't that many hoops to jump when working with<br>
documentation and if you feel like there are, that's why there is a<br>
community to help you with it. If you feel like some documentation is<br>
inadequate, open a launchpad bug with it, or just send a draft here<br>
with just plain text, we'll transform it for you in the correct format<br>
and all that so you don't have to worry it at all. Any good content is<br>
usable and extremely helpful to us.<br>
<br>
As a contributor, there are many ways we can work this out friends .<br>
If you feel like the manual project is splitting the efforts and so<br>
on, just submit the draft that you have to both mailing lists, and<br>
then let them worry about how to organize and pull the content<br>
together. Of course there are issues that we still need to iron out<br>
and I am sure in the upcoming months we will hopefully work towards a<br>
better solution.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Regards,<br>
Vikram Dhillon<br>
<br>
--<br>
ubuntu-doc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Jonathan Aquilina
</div>