ubuntu-doc Digest, Vol 44, Issue 29

[James Hawkins]

Yeah I think that is a good idea.
Is there a list of thing that Ubuntu has contibuted to so far?

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:00 AM, <ubuntu-doc-request at lists.ubuntu.com>
wrote:

> Send ubuntu-doc mailing list submissions to
>        ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        ubuntu-doc-request at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        ubuntu-doc-owner at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of ubuntu-doc digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: [ubuntu-marketing] Making Canonical's/Ubuntu's
>      contributions     more visible (Przemys?aw Kulczycki)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 11:36:32 +0200
> From: Przemys?aw Kulczycki  <przemekkulczycki at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-marketing] Making Canonical's/Ubuntu's
>        contributions   more visible
> To: ubuntu-devel-discuss <ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Cc: ubuntu-marketing <ubuntu-marketing at lists.ubuntu.com>,
>        ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <48369020.9030700 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Nick Ali pisze:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Przemys?aw Kulczycki
> > <przemekkulczycki at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> [disclaimer]
> >> I don't know which list is the best to discuss it because there is no
> >> specific list for discussing Ubuntu's website, so sorry for the
> duplication.
> >> When the thread expands someone could decide to keep it on only one
> list.
> >>
> >> Now let's get to the point.
> >> One of the often accusations against Ubuntu is that it only takes from
> other
> >> projects (Debian, Red Hat, Novell/Suse...) and doesn't give back
> anything.
> >> Ubuntu should make it more visible for others to see what does it
> contribute
> >> to upstream/floss community.
> >> Red Hat and Novell have websites listing their contributions to free
> >> software:
> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RedHatContributions
> >> http://www.redhat.com/truthhappens/leadership/osdevelopment/
> >> http://www.novell.com/company/affiliations/
> >
> > This is more of an issue for developers than the website itself. I
> > also believe that it was discussed during FOSSCamp.
>
> Good. I hope something will be done about it ASAP.
> Reading all those comments about Ubuntu not contributing anything is
> really irritating.
>
> --
> ## Przemys?aw Kulczycki <<>> Azrael Nightwalker ##
> # jabber: azrael[na]jabster.pl | tlen: azrael29a #
> ### www: http://reksio.ftj.agh.edu.pl/~azrael/<http://reksio.ftj.agh.edu.pl/%7Eazrael/>###
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 252 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> Url :
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20080523/266a3c36/attachment-0001.pgp
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>
>
> End of ubuntu-doc Digest, Vol 44, Issue 29
> ******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20080523/93dcb3b8/attachment.html>