technical review

[Nick Ellery]

I think that you do actually have a point.  The problem with this is that
new members of the team like myself have nothing to work on until a release
comes near.  Perhaps there is something else that we can be assigned to in
that time.

Thanks,

Nick

On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Matthew East <mdke at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I think the new "technical review" initiative has already had plenty
> of success in getting people involved. However, it strikes me that
> this is something we should be focusing on towards the end of the
> release cycle, rather than at the beginning, where the focus should be
> on new material. Since the operating system is going to change a huge
> amount in terms of features and detail over the next 6 months,
> reviewing the documentation in detail for accuracy is a bit pointless.
>
> Obviously if we are doing a focused review of the 8.04 documentation
> with a view to pushing post-release updates to that documentation,
> then that is worth doing, but in that case the focus of the review
> needs to be changed, because it should be more carefully limited to
> definite errors in the documentation, rather than simply things which
> it would be nice to cover.
>
> What do people think?
>
> --
> Matthew East
> http://www.mdke.org
> gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20080427/aae8221a/attachment.html>