Hierarchy of trustworthiness (was Re: I presumptuously created a wiki page)

[Matthew East]

On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 13:54 +0200, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 10:08 +0100, Matthew East wrote: 
> > 
> > It's quite right that a hierarchy needs to exist. 
> It's always good getting back to common ground..
> 
> > But it isn't as simple
> > as a-d, we need to think a lot more carefully about the distinctions we
> > want to make.
> So how do your thoughts differ from my a-d?

Broadly, I think there should be more grades than this.

> >  My preferred solution would be
> > to use category tags in a more advanced way to the way they are used
> > now, but this needs some careful thought.
> So, again, what are your thoughts on this.

I would like to give you a careful answer, and be involved in a long and
detailed discussion about this problem, but it simply isn't high
priority at the moment, with our string freeze hours away, and lots to
do. Perhaps this can be discussed when the Dapper documentation is out
of the way?

Thanks, Matt
-- 
mdke at ubuntu.com
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20060405/bec74855/attachment.pgp>