I presumptuously created a wiki page

[Brian Burger]

On 4/4/06, Duncan Lithgow <duncan at lithgow-schmidt.dk> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 01:01 +0100, Paul O'Malley wrote:
> > Andrew Zajac wrote:
> >
> > >Hi docs!
> > >
> > >I looked and could not find a similar page.
> > >
> > >https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UsabilityCaseStudies
> > >
> > >There have been a number of times that I thought of a usability issue
> but
>
> This brings us (again) to the question of where this page should be
> linked from, so that people actually find it.


There are various Testing pages around the wiki - linking this page to/from
them makes sense to me.

According to current
> practise (according to NaamanCampbell) if it's linked to
> UserDocumentation it will be removed, and in all cases it will probably
> be added to CategoryCleanup.


Well, yes. Most new pages get added to CatCleanup, although this
particular page doesn't seem to need it.

Despite the stated policy, there are lots of pages that belong to both
CatDocs & CatCleanup - adding a link to UserDocumentation itself is a
different thing, though.

I suggest we begin a UserDocumentationRaw to link to _all_
> documentation, finished or not. I'd be happy to do this if others agree.


I'm still not convinced that giant list of the entire wiki is any
better than the existing search function.

UserDocsRaw doesn't seem to add anything to the organization of the wiki,
IMO. I agree that we do have something of an organization problem - I'm just
not sure how -Raw helps solve it.

Brian/Madpilot.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20060404/9e9d40b1/attachment.html>