[long] Canonical are you serious?

[Sean Wheller]

On Monday 24 January 2005 18:08, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:32:35PM +0800, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > If that is true (I can't check it atm, but mdz, mako or others please
> > confirm on this), we don't need symlinks and we would just need to work
> > with a vendor drop of the Gnome User's Guide
> > (http://www.gnome.org/learn/users-guide/2.6/) which wouldn't need
> > symlinks, so we could do with any version of subversion and be all
> > happy.
>
> I post a relevant IRC log:
>
> <enrico> jdub: could you please have a read at
>        
>  http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/2005-January/001063.html ?
> <enrico> jdub: if that is true, we solved all the problems
>   <jdub> enrico: i don't quite get the question, but:
>   <jdub> - gnome cvs will be mirrored in arch

Agreed. If it isn't already. Each GNOME app has a C/ directory. Docs like 
"GNOME Users Guide" are a different case.

>   <jdub> - the right way to manage changes is to create a branch off those
> <enrico> you mean a branch off the arch mirror?
>   <jdub> yes
>   <jdub> that's what arch is all about :)
> <enrico> So, if we want to fiddle with the documentation of the various
>          applications, we need to branch off the development arch repo
>   <jdub> i guess i should get on -docs and sort this all out

Let's do this on list, please.


-- 
Sean Wheller
Technical Author
sean at inwords.co.za
http://www.inwords.co.za
Registered Linux User #375355
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20050124/12e884d0/attachment.pgp>