Worthwhile critique from Mathew Thomas

[Corey Burger]

On 4/14/05, Jonathan Jesse <jjesse at iserv.net> wrote:
> I read that "Critque" and was frankly turned off how worthwhile the whole
> bit was.  It seemed like someone wasn't happy with Ubuntu and had an axe
> to grind.  Most of it seemed like he had tried to make some "improvements"
> or suggestions to Ubuntu and then when it was rejected took his ball home
> and decided to slam the distro as a whole.
> 
> I am curious as to see what exactly he would consider a great distrobution
> and what his "target audience" was.  Have of the problems he had seemed
> more like a Gnome related problem that one would find w/ any distro out
> there.   Am I mistaken?  I am not the most knowledgeable linux expert out
> there yet I found myself thinking about how I didn't care about half the
> stuff he was talking about.
> 
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>

Couple of points
1. He works for canonical
2. He is quite right*
3. I agree with him*
*on most things

To be blunt and too the point.  We chatted on IRC today. He is going
to be at the next Docteam irc meeting to share his views.

Corey