Summary from UDD meeting 2011-03-23

Martin Pool mbp at canonical.com
Fri Mar 25 05:04:48 UTC 2011


On 25 March 2011 15:53, Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure what bugs this would be traded off for, but I think import
> reliability is paramount for broader acceptance of UDD.  Unless people are
> confident enough the branch will be current not to worry about double
> checking, the need to double check things are up to date will be  a barrier to
> adoption.

Thanks for that; that is my main concern about the idea of doing new features.

I don't have in mind a specific "we won't do bugs 1, 2, and 3"; it's
just that if say half the team is working on this there will be 50%
less cycles available to deal with import failures.

Martin



More information about the ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list