Summary from UDD meeting 2011-03-23

[Barry Warsaw]

On Mar 25, 2011, at 12:53 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:

>On Thursday, March 24, 2011 09:50:26 pm Martin Pool wrote:
>> I'd like to see it happen.  How do UDD community members feel about
>> this vs bug fixing and import reliability?
>
>I'm not sure what bugs this would be traded off for, but I think import
>reliability is paramount for broader acceptance of UDD.  Unless people are
>confident enough the branch will be current not to worry about double
>checking, the need to double check things are up to date will be a barrier to
>adoption.

I do agree with Scott that import reliability is really critical to adoption.
You can't use UDD if the branch is out of date!  BFBIP seems like a step after
getting wide adoption of 'bzr branch' instead of 'apt-get source'.

Cheers,
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-distributed-devel/attachments/20110325/43b63540/attachment.pgp>