your thoughts wanted on bzr team UDD focus

[Max Bowsher]

Martin Pool wrote:
> 2009/12/5 Max Bowsher <maxb at f2s.com>:
>> John's question is then:
>>  So how did Ubuntu find "1.1" such that it isn't an ancestor of "2.1"?
>>  Are they using different upstreams? Or are these tarball imports such
>>  that 2.1 secretly should be a descendant of 1.1, but nobody recorded
>>  that fact?
>>
>> Thus phrased, the answer is rather clearer.
> 
> But perhaps not quite so clear it's not worth spelling out... :-)
> 
> I think maxb is saying: we should retrospectively insert that edge
> into the graph, or something equivalent?

Oh :-)

No, all I was saying was: Now I've inserted actual version numbers into
the graph, you can see that the reason for the divergence is that Ubuntu
imported an upstream version that Debian skipped.

Max.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-distributed-devel/attachments/20091207/4cb94bec/attachment.pgp