your thoughts wanted on bzr team UDD focus
Martin Pool
mbp at canonical.com
Mon Dec 7 06:55:37 GMT 2009
2009/12/5 Max Bowsher <maxb at f2s.com>:
> John's question is then:
> So how did Ubuntu find "1.1" such that it isn't an ancestor of "2.1"?
> Are they using different upstreams? Or are these tarball imports such
> that 2.1 secretly should be a descendant of 1.1, but nobody recorded
> that fact?
>
> Thus phrased, the answer is rather clearer.
But perhaps not quite so clear it's not worth spelling out... :-)
I think maxb is saying: we should retrospectively insert that edge
into the graph, or something equivalent?
--
Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/>
More information about the ubuntu-distributed-devel
mailing list