command-not-found appropriate for standard?

[Anzan Hoshin Roshi]

I depend upon command-not-found to keep me sane. It has helped me fifty or
more times over the last few years.

On 18 August 2010 18:19, Stefan Potyra <
stefan.potyra at informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am Wednesday 18 August 2010 23:53:45 schrieb Dustin Kirkland:
> > On Aug 18, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at canonical.com> wrote:
> > > On Aug 18, 2010, at 01:12 PM, Mathias Gug wrote:
> > >>IMO the command-not-found package is very useful for server
> > >>installation. So I'd like to keep it when a system is installed from
> > >>the -server iso.
> > >
> > > I hope it will be kept for desktop as well.  I think it's a very useful
> > > tool.
> >
> > +1 for command-not-found on both Desktop and Server.  It's one of the
> > most useful, unique, and friendly tools in Ubuntu, IMO.
>
> *'shameless plug*: command-not-found doesn't appear to be in a
> well-maintained
> state in Ubuntu, otherwise this bug would have been not around for
> maverick:
>
> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/538306>
>
> So at the moment, I consider command-not-found as not ready for a default
> installation on either image, and would be very happy to be proved wrong
> :).
>
> Cheers,
>   Stefan.
>
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
>
>
Yours,
Anzan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20100818/7232a643/attachment.htm