command-not-found appropriate for standard?

[Stefan Potyra]

Hi,

Am Wednesday 18 August 2010 23:53:45 schrieb Dustin Kirkland:
> On Aug 18, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at canonical.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 18, 2010, at 01:12 PM, Mathias Gug wrote:
> >>IMO the command-not-found package is very useful for server
> >>installation. So I'd like to keep it when a system is installed from
> >>the -server iso.
> >
> > I hope it will be kept for desktop as well.  I think it's a very useful
> > tool.
>
> +1 for command-not-found on both Desktop and Server.  It's one of the
> most useful, unique, and friendly tools in Ubuntu, IMO.

*'shameless plug*: command-not-found doesn't appear to be in a well-maintained 
state in Ubuntu, otherwise this bug would have been not around for maverick:

<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/538306>

So at the moment, I consider command-not-found as not ready for a default 
installation on either image, and would be very happy to be proved wrong :).

Cheers,
  Stefan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20100819/9bed86d3/attachment.pgp