bogofilter (Re: Review: Syncing from testing a success?)

[Matt Zimmerman]

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:23:18AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:23:58AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > > As upstream maintainer of a couple of packages, I must say I'm rather  
> > > unhappy that I see outdated versions currently in pipe for Lucid, namely
> > [bogofilter]
> 
>  Looking at the version in unstable, it seems for bofogilter we're about
>  to be able to drop the Ubuntu packaging changes with the next merge,
>  but the packaging changes in unstable are large and numerous, so it's
>  not a trivial merge; I'd prefer deferring this merge to post-lucid.  I
>  would agree that we should try to get the new upstream release fixing
>  LP #320829 in Ubuntu though.
> 
>  I pushed the new upstream release to my PPA (ppa:lool) and it seemed to
>  be safe and bugfix only, so I don't think it needs a FFE (I looked at
>  the relatively large diff but the actual changes are small), but I'm
>  not actually using bogofilter myself, it's pulled on my system because
>  evolution depends on it -- I would prefer if someone else would test
>  the new package before I upload it.  Please ping me if you do!

I've installed 1.2.1-0ubuntu1~dooz1 on my system (I use bogofilter-bdb, but
not -sqlite) and it's working OK so far.  It's only processed a few
minutes of mail so far, though.

-- 
 - mdz