On-Call Reviews in #ubuntu-reviews

[Brian Murray]

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:10:33AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:14:22 +0200 Daniel Holbach 
> <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> >Am Mittwoch, den 09.09.2009, 09:50 +0200 schrieb Daniel Holbach:
> >> The experience we had in the session was that the channel got very busy
> >> very quickly, which is why I suggested the creation of another, more
> >> quiet channel.
> >
> >The Launchpad Team had a similar discussion already:
> >https://lists.launchpad.net/launchpad-dev/msg00830.html
> >
> >More opinions?
> 
> We advertise #ubuntu-motu as the place to go to learn about packaging.
> I don't think having it be the place to learn about packaging, except
> if you want to review actual details about packaging, that's a
> different channel works very well.

I don't think this is a very good argument because the #ubuntu-reviews
channel is not for just reviewing packaging as you say, rather it is for
reviewing code.  This would include reviewing patches that have not been
incorporated into a debdiff.
 
-- 
Brian Murray                                                 @ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20090911/c5709d3c/attachment-0002.pgp