On-Call Reviews in #ubuntu-reviews
stefan.potyra at informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Fri Sep 11 19:33:36 BST 2009
Am Friday 11 September 2009 20:01:18 schrieb Brian Murray:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:10:33AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:14:22 +0200 Daniel Holbach
> > <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > >Am Mittwoch, den 09.09.2009, 09:50 +0200 schrieb Daniel Holbach:
> > >> The experience we had in the session was that the channel got very
> > >> busy very quickly, which is why I suggested the creation of another,
> > >> more quiet channel.
> > >
> > >The Launchpad Team had a similar discussion already:
> > >https://lists.launchpad.net/launchpad-dev/msg00830.html
> > >
> > >More opinions?
> > We advertise #ubuntu-motu as the place to go to learn about packaging.
> > I don't think having it be the place to learn about packaging, except
> > if you want to review actual details about packaging, that's a
> > different channel works very well.
*Nod*, yes I guess calls for reviews are on-topic for the development
channels, so I don't see any need for an additional channel.
> I don't think this is a very good argument because the #ubuntu-reviews
> channel is not for just reviewing packaging as you say, rather it is for
> reviewing code. This would include reviewing patches that have not been
> incorporated into a debdiff.
Reviewing patching is an important part of packaging, whether in debdiff
format or otherwise.
Or do you mean that #ubuntu-reviews should target mainly software authors'
questions in regards to coding?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20090911/52a8cb72/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel