Lucid Release Schedule
robbie at ubuntu.com
Mon Nov 2 02:29:31 GMT 2009
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 22:15 -0400, Andrew SB wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Robbie Williamson <robbie at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 22:19 +0000, Matthew East wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Robbie Williamson <robbie at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> >> > You are absolutely correct :), and I've tried to correct these errors.
> >> > Please review and let me know if things are better.
> >> Thanks Robbie - that looks better from a documentation team point of view.
> >> A couple of quick minor comments on a quick read of the schedule:
> >> 1. I'd say that the artwork deadlines are wrong. Currently the final
> >> artwork deadline comes after the DocumentationStringFreeze, which
> >> means that the desktop could in theory change at a time when it isn't
> >> possible to update screenshots. That isn't a problem for the
> >> documentation team at the moment, because we don't use screenshots in
> >> the desktop documentation. Really artwork is covered by the current
> >> definition of UserInterfaceFreeze
> >> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UserInterfaceFreeze) so it would probably be
> >> helpful to get this clarified. I think it was intentional that artwork
> >> be covered by the UI Freeze
> >> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DapperReleaseProcess).
> > To be honest, I questioned the need for these deadlines in the Karmic
> > cycle at all. Until Karmic, there was no definition of these
> > terms...just words in the schedule, so I tried to define them as best as
> > I could :/. After reading the definition of UserInterfaceFreeze
> > (again), I agree it needs to be clarified. I went to the Ubuntu Artwork
> > page , and I believe these deadlines are for artwork that is packaged
> > and made available as *Community-maintained* software (i.e. in
> > universe). I've updated the definitions to make this clearer
> > (hopefully), and de-emphasized the drops (i.e., moved them to the
> > left-most column) since they aren't as critical to the release schedule
> > as the deadlines & freezes, IMO.
> >  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork
> I've also wondered about the usefulness of these deadlines. They've
> felt very undefined in the past, especially the Artwork Deadline. That
> aside, I can certainly tell you that the community artwork team didn't
> define the
> ArtworkFirstDrop , ArtworkSecondDrop , and ArtworkDeadline 
> schedule. They have existed for quite some time. At the end of the
> Jaunty cycle when we created the present selection process for themes
> in the "community-themes" package.  We choose to use those
> pre-existing deadlines in order to mirror the "official" artwork
> If we are indeed the only people using those, I would suggest removing
> them from the release schedule all together. The official artwork
> didn't follow this schedual at all during Karmic. As it stands now, it
> simply seems to cause confusion. Just read all the disappointment on
> the forums when an "Artwork Drop" passes with no changes to the
> official theme.
Works for me! :) I wanted to drop them, but as you can see, changes to
the schedule always come with a "price" ;).
> - Andrew
>  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkFirstDrop
>  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkSecondDrop
>  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkDeadline
>  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Documentation/CommunityThemes
Robbie Williamson twitter/identi.ca: undacuvabrutha
Ubuntu Foundations & Security Team Manager robbiew[irc.freenode.net]
http://wiki.ubuntu.com robbie at ubuntu.com
"You can't be lucky all the time, but you can be smart everyday"
"Arrogance is thinking you are better than everyone else, while
Confidence is knowing no one else is better than you." -Me ;)
More information about the ubuntu-devel