Best practice for reporting bugs
mdz at canonical.com
Wed Mar 25 11:58:11 GMT 2009
I've noticed that, even among Ubuntu devleopers, not everyone is applying
our best practices for reporting bugs. In particular, reporting bugs
directly to Launchpad is usually *NOT* the best approach. This should only
be done if there is no better option.
In almost all cases, it is preferable to report the bug using Apport. This
can be done in one of the following ways:
1. If the bug is a crash, apport should automatically generate a report and
guide you in filing it. Copies of the crash reports are stored in
/var/crash in case you need to refer to them directly.
2. The "Help" menu in many applications includes an entry "Report a
problem..." which will invoke Apport manually.
3. On the command line, you can run "ubuntu-bug <package>" (or "ubuntu-bug
<PID>") to invoke Apport manually. Kernel bugs should be reported with
Using this method will automatically attach the relevant version
information, log files, etc. where available. This saves you time in filing
the bug, and saves others time in analyzing it. For example, filing a bug
on the kernel will automatically include dmesg, lspci and so on.
We're about to get flooded with bug reports from the beta, so please
start using this method immediately, and encourage everyone else who reports
bugs to do the same.
More instructions for filing bugs can be found in the community
documentation at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs
Note that if someone files a bug without using apport, you can still take
advantage of it to add the information later (assuming it's still relevant),
by using apport-collect(1). See
If you'd like to enhance your packages to take better advantage of apport by
attaching relevant data, please ask for help. It's very simple once you
know how to do it. The basics can be found at
More information about the ubuntu-devel