uswsusp or not?
steve.langasek at ubuntu.com
Fri Sep 26 19:20:04 BST 2008
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 01:00:42PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 12:26 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Just drop the Debian-specific patch that uses the uswsusp code at all.
> > It's an entirely unnecessary deviation from upstream that results in
> > increased awkwardness.
> > s2ram was dropped because people in the forums were encouraging people
> > to install and use it, rather than reporting bugs about the Ubuntu code.
> > It duplicates the functionality of pmutils and its presence causes user
> > confusion.
> Thanks for the information Matthew. I have proposed the attached patch
> which removes the "auto" setting.
Could we actually drop the patch from the package, rather than just dropping
it from the series file? Otherwise, it's a bit opaque when it comes time to
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
More information about the ubuntu-devel