uswsusp or not?

[James Westby]

On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 12:26 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Just drop the Debian-specific patch that uses the uswsusp code at all. 
> It's an entirely unnecessary deviation from upstream that results in 
> increased awkwardness.
> 
> s2ram was dropped because people in the forums were encouraging people 
> to install and use it, rather than reporting bugs about the Ubuntu code. 
> It duplicates the functionality of pmutils and its presence causes user 
> confusion.
> 

Thanks for the information Matthew. I have proposed the attached patch
which removes the "auto" setting.

Thanks,

James

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu3.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1821 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20080926/be3d0018/attachment.bin