should people.ubuntu.com be people.canonical.com

[Benj. Mako Hill]

<quote who="Jordan Mantha" date="Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:05:01AM -0700">
> I would like to suggest that one of two things be done with this situation:
> 
>   1. allow all developers (or maybe even members) to have access to
> people.ubuntu.com . I feel this would justify the URL, i.e. the people
> that make Ubuntu
> 
>   2. Move people.ubuntu.com to people.canonical.com to free the
> people.ubuntu.com URL for community focused usage. This would, IMO,
> more accurately represent reality than the current usage.
> 
> I personally favor option 1, for reasons explained below.

We should do both. It's useful to have a people.canonical.com for Ubuntu
users but there should be a version of people.ubuntu.com, accessible
through launchpad accounts, that's available to all Ubuntu members.

You are absolutely correct to bring this up. Let's write up a
specification for how this transition will work and what we will create
to replace people.ubuntu.com (on a technical level) and get in as a goal
during the next release cycle. If you think that an official CC blessing
is necessary, I'm happy to do my part to push for it.

Later,
Mako



-- 
Benjamin Mako Hill
mako at ubuntu.com
http://mako.cc

Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results. --RMS
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20070920/bba8ecb5/attachment.pgp