How long will 64bit Ubuntu users have to wait?
Tollef Fog Heen
tfheen at canonical.com
Fri Sep 29 21:53:12 BST 2006
Kilz _ skrev:
> This isn't a why my wireless card isn't working. This is why isn't
> something setup to work that can be. You are also assuming that another
> user is going to be able to solve what you think is a problem. When in
> fact the problem is that the applications being included in the 64bit
> version do not work. When in fact I am the one that is trying to make it
> "just work" for users.
It does work, it just doesn't include support for other architectures.
Do you consider the lack of a qemu-wrapped firefox for PowerPC a bug
making the platform unusable? If you need support for i386 binaries,
run an i386 distribution.
> A 32bit office suit was
> made available. Are you suggesting that more people use office
> applications than browsers?
We have a fully-working browser on amd64. It works just fine for me and
I use it for hours every day. Openoffice.org was not available for
amd64 until recently (or had very serious stability problems). I was
not happy about how we did the Openoffice.org packaging -- it was a hack
and I am happy that it is gone. If you wish to help make 32 bit
applications work on amd64, I suggest you read up on my multiarch papers
as well as the documents available from
http://multiarch.alioth.debian.org/ and implement the suggestions there.
> Sadly I don't think for one second the developers want to increase
> Ubuntu use on one of the growing segments of computer users. 64bit
> system owners.
Get real.
- tfheen
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list