Why no reply-to header?

Mon Sep 4 20:10:44 BST 2006

On ma, 2006-09-04 at 18:00 +0100, Toby Smithe wrote:
> Surely a reply-to would make sense?

Please don't start the zillionth thread on this.
-- 
Dennis K.

Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20060904/6b2cb8a7/attachment.pgp