kevin.perros at free.fr
Sun Nov 26 12:23:25 GMT 2006
I believe that the point is not to argue for or against insertion of
I believe that a distribution committed to libre-software should
maintain and *distribute as iso images*, a distribution containing only
free software. This should the primary target distribution and the
distribution containing the non-free stuff should be only a derivative
of the later.
Making a distibution that is articulated around non-free software will
lead, on the long term, to so many dependancies on the non-free stuff
that both versions of the distributions will vary enormously in
Major distributors like Mandriva, which contains an iso disributed
Mandriva-Free and a series of non-free are Free distributors because
there is an easy way to use the distribution : burn the CDs and go on.
Using a free Ubuntu is far more difficult : you must make a net install,
setup the good repositories, things that are far from newbie-friendly.
More information about the ubuntu-devel