2c about the development of ubuntu
mdz at ubuntu.com
Tue Jan 3 02:33:54 GMT 2006
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:04:38AM +0100, Udo 'Robos' Puetz wrote:
> That is my point! If you don't work with the ui yourself you are not bound
> to find these bugs. The itch-scratch thing applies here: if you get bitten
> by the itch you can better scratch it than when you only see a bug-report.
> And holding a deadline, at all cost, is nothing to be proud of. If debian
> would go about with such problems they would have lots more releases. But
> they even cater to 11 (?) architectures and the bugs stemming from that.
> Plonk! Okay, I want this to come over soft, but if you wouldn't have to look
> into a supported kde you would have a) more time to look into the ui
> _yourself_ and experience the ui and discuss possible ways and b) important
> packages like input methods or modem/isdn might get fixed.
I don't agree with either conjecture here. Debian's difficulties in release
management are not due to intolerance for bugs, and KDE is not a factor in
whether scim is supported in Ubuntu or not.
If you can help us get scim working well in Ubuntu, I would welcome that.
If you are not a developer yourself, but are concerned about a lack of
manpower in Ubuntu for the specific projects you feel are important, perhaps
you could help to recruit new Ubuntu developers with similar interests.
More information about the ubuntu-devel