separate /home by default

thephotoman rantman_2000 at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 1 16:42:36 CST 2005


Well, I wouldn't call them "idiots", I'd just call them "people who 
don't know that there's a way to keep your data even if you have to 
re-install your operating system without doing backups every five minutes".

Not that using /home as a separate partition gets you out of having to 
back up your personal data...the /home partition can break too.  It's 
just that you have more options when it's just your data/programs.

Emil Oppeln-Bronikowski wrote:
> On wto, 2005-02-01 at 02:16 -0500, John Richard Moser wrote:
> 
> 
>>Shouldn't /home be separate from / by default?
> 
> 
>  I think it's up to users. I split my disk even more, when others with
> small disks (yes, there's a plenty of users with 3Gb and less) will
> prefer to have one, big / to avoid problems with lack of space for, let
> say apt-get cache.
> 
> 
>>I've seen too many idiots
> 
> 
>  Just because they do something in a different (even if it's less
> secure, or whatever) way, don't mean they are idiots.
> 
>  I'd like to remind you about Code Of Conduct. :-)
> 




More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list