separate /home by default
thephotoman
rantman_2000 at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 1 16:42:36 CST 2005
Well, I wouldn't call them "idiots", I'd just call them "people who
don't know that there's a way to keep your data even if you have to
re-install your operating system without doing backups every five minutes".
Not that using /home as a separate partition gets you out of having to
back up your personal data...the /home partition can break too. It's
just that you have more options when it's just your data/programs.
Emil Oppeln-Bronikowski wrote:
> On wto, 2005-02-01 at 02:16 -0500, John Richard Moser wrote:
>
>
>>Shouldn't /home be separate from / by default?
>
>
> I think it's up to users. I split my disk even more, when others with
> small disks (yes, there's a plenty of users with 3Gb and less) will
> prefer to have one, big / to avoid problems with lack of space for, let
> say apt-get cache.
>
>
>>I've seen too many idiots
>
>
> Just because they do something in a different (even if it's less
> secure, or whatever) way, don't mean they are idiots.
>
> I'd like to remind you about Code Of Conduct. :-)
>
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list