Ubuntu Domain Server

Ryan Dwyer ryandwyer1 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 22 03:19:12 UTC 2009


Do you think the Linux/Ubuntu community would be willing to change the way
system logons work if it meant bug #1 could be completed?
-Ryan

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Christopher Chan <
christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk> wrote:

> Ryan Dwyer wrote:
>
>> I've never used remote installation services or SCCM. I'll change the spec
>> so it doesn't deny their existence.
>>
>
> That will definitely give this credibility.
>
>
>> If you look at the mockup pictures I made email is the list and so is file
>> sharing. A centralised account database is so obvious that I didn't mention
>> it in the spec. It does mention it in the Name and Role mockup.
>>
>
> But that part will be the one that is fraught with challenges. For example,
> an existing 'standalone' machine cannot just 'join' a 'domain'. You have to
> reconcile the standalone machine's system accounts with those in the
> 'domain'. It might be so obvious but you have not addressed the challenge
> posed.
>
>
>> Your last line has got me curious. Why can't this be applied to Linux/UNIX
>> systems?
>>
>
> Eg: as above, there is no such thing as 'local' accounts and 'domain'
> accounts with Linux/UNIX systems.
>
>
>> -Ryan
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher <
>> christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk <mailto:christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>    Shentino wrote:
>>
>>        My first impression is that it's something to look into.
>>
>>
>>    Disk images? Give me a break. Disk images (a feature that Windows
>>    Server does not have) will make this the laughing stock of the IT
>>    world. There is a reason by Windows Server offers automatic remote
>>    installation of workstations and not creation of disk images. It
>>    is completely impractical and impossible if you include all the
>>    various software that may need installing on the workstation. Even
>>    I do not ghost the hundreds of Windows workstations I have to
>>    manage here in the school whether by CD or over the network.
>>    Automatic *installation* over the network complete with hostname
>>    assignment on installation is what you want. Tools for this are
>>    already in place. How about 'install image' that can be put on a
>>    CD or a flash drive or loaded over the network and performs the
>>    installation by prepping the box and then pulling the packages
>>    over the network since you are targeting businesses.
>>
>>    I love the part about auditing and centralized management of
>>    software being features that Windows does not have. Ever heard of
>>    System Management Server? Wait, that thing is ancient. Ever heard
>>    of System Configuration Center Manager? Auditing, software
>>    management, patch management, all there. Even without buying that,
>>    you can already push software packages via group policy.
>>
>>    Man, check out the competition before you got listing supposedly
>>    missing features. What is with the love of NT-style domains or
>>    terminology?
>>
>>    Oh, where is the part about integrating services like email (I
>>    think this is rather crucial to a business) and file/print? OH,
>>    please do not forget a centralized user information database.
>>    Somehow, the part about 'joining a workstation' sends shivers down
>>    my spine on how you think this will be accomplished.
>>
>>        I'm sure that us open source monkeys can improve on Microsoft
>>        in this area
>>        :)
>>
>>
>>    Yeah. By doing things the 'Linux' way and not copying concepts
>>    that even Microsoft has moved on from and cannot be applied to
>>    Linux/UNIX operationg systems.
>>
>>
>>        On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Ryan Dwyer
>>        <ryandwyer1 at gmail.com <mailto:ryandwyer1 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>            I've made a specs page here:
>>            https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBusinessServer
>>            You can also see some mockup pictures I made here:
>>            Name and Role:
>>            http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/1210/namerole.png
>>            Computer Details:
>>            http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/1740/computerz.png
>>            Workstation Images:
>>            http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/6757/22666240.png
>>            Web Server:
>>            http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/1795/webserver.png
>>
>>            I'm unsure at this stage whether I'll submit it to
>>            Brainstorm or go
>>            straight to a Launchpad blueprint, but at least I've got a
>>            spec for people
>>            to look at.
>>
>>            Any feedback or suggestions are appreciated.
>>
>>            -Ryan
>>
>>            On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Chan Chung Hang
>>            Christopher <
>>            christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk
>>            <mailto:christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>                Shentino wrote:
>>
>>                    I can't very well speak as a "heavy iron" type
>>                    server administrator but
>>
>>                as
>>
>>                    an "end user peon", so to speak, I have found that
>>                    GUIs add convenience,
>>
>>                and
>>
>>                    in many cases "point and click" is faster and more
>>                    convenient than doing
>>                    everything on a command line.  Doubly so if due to
>>                    a caffeine shortage
>>
>>                I'm a
>>
>>                    bit of a sloppy typist.
>>                    My two cents.
>>
>>
>>                You obviously have not tried to 'point and click' a
>>                few dozen iterations
>>                while installing and configuring a Windows computer.
>>                That is
>>                INCONVENIENT and takes AGES. Although it is not
>>                command line, I use
>>                keyboard shortcuts to speed up the process. Alt-N,
>>                Alt-A, Alt-I for
>>                installing dotnetfx for example. No way you can beat
>>                the keyboard. Even
>>                better if you can use command line switches to forego
>>                the entire process
>>                of "point and click". A command line version asking
>>                'Y/N' is just as
>>                likely to be faster than any point and click too.
>>
>>
>>                This whole GUI for administration business is a
>>                complete sham imho and
>>                only serves the needs of paper MCSEs or whatever they
>>                call the latest
>>                version of certificates from Microsoft. These guys
>>                need to LEARN MORE
>>                whether they will continue administer Windows or move
>>                to Linux.
>>
>>
>>
>>                --
>>                Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
>>                Ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com
>>                <mailto:Ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>                Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
>>
>>
>>            --
>>            Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
>>            Ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com
>>            <mailto:Ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>            Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>            https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20091022/fef241c0/attachment.html>


More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list