Few notes on filing "papercut" bugs
Matthew Paul Thomas
mpt at canonical.com
Tue Jun 16 11:06:54 UTC 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mat Tomaszewski wrote on 12/06/09 12:07:
>...
> The response so far has been overwhelming and we are already finding
> it difficult to filter out bugs that indeed are "papercuts" from the
> ones that aren't. On that note, I think we need a clearer definition
> of which bugs do qualify as papercuts.
>
> Please do file as papercuts:
>
> - bugs that are system-wide (Nautilus, Gnome panel, etc), rather than
> app-specific (F-Spot, OOo, Terminal, etc.)
>...
I suggest judging bugs by how many people they are likely to affect,
regardless of whether they're in a particular application or not. A bug
that affects 50% of people using Banshee is probably more important to
fix than a bug that affects 5% of people using gnome-panel's brightness
applet.
Cheers
- --
Matthew Paul Thomas
http://mpt.net.nz/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAko3fMkACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecrOrgCfTjn1rKPKMd1UDOONVU4feulM
WX8An1jyk2xJouVHEQBCQHHt1GIdxqa+
=/xtI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list