Few notes on filing "papercut" bugs
Mat Tomaszewski
mat.tomaszewski at canonical.com
Fri Jun 12 11:07:07 UTC 2009
Hi,
During the recent UDS we launched a "100 Paper Cuts" project
(https://edge.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts), aiming to target and fix
small but significant design and usability bugs in Ubuntu. We set an
arbitrary target of 100 to be fixed for Karmic release.
The response so far has been overwhelming and we are already finding it
difficult to filter out bugs that indeed are "papercuts" from the ones
that aren't. On that note, I think we need a clearer definition of which
bugs do qualify as papercuts.
Please do file as papercuts:
- bugs that are system-wide (Nautilus, Gnome panel, etc), rather than
app-specific (F-Spot, OOo, Terminal, etc.)
- bugs that impact standard workflows (like connecting to the network,
copying files, browsing folders, etc.), rather than specialised or
corner case workflows (e.g. dragging an image in evince)
- bugs that are easy to address, rather that ones that require
significant design or development efforts
- issues with existing features, rather than requests for new features
- bugs that relate to usability and design (like size of the
notification bubbles), rather than broken software (e.g. notifications
flickering in fullscreen)
Please pass this message on to anyone who may be interested in making
Ubuntu better.
Many thanks!
Mat
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list