shameful censoring of mono opposition
remco47 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 9 01:27:15 UTC 2009
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:17 AM, David
Schlesinger<David.Schlesinger at access-company.com> wrote:
>> Basically, it just needs the same love as Mono.
> One thing I think I can state with certainty about free and open source
> software development is that demanding that a bunch of other folks drop what
> they're doing and "give love" to something else on your behalf never works.
> Maybe your time, and Mark's, would be better spent writing a credible F-Spot
> replacement if you think that's something that needs to be done; certainly
> don't expect anyone else to do it because F-Spot happens to upset you.
And see what I wrote half a day ago:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Remco<remco47 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Mark Fink<mpfink at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I see you are shooting the messenger, steve.
>> the MONO camp has infiltrated canonical and now they are going around
>> censoring anything that proves MONO to be the poison that it is. this
>> is not a laughing matter and the fact that you slandering roy
>> schestowitz only goes to show you are probably part of the problem.
> These accusations are not helping your case. If you want to really
> solve the problem you need to:
> * improve the Gnome-Java bindings and get them in Ubuntu
> * make a Java equivalent of F-Spot and Tomboy
> * push for replacement of these apps and the framework
> I'm all for replacing Mono with Java, but the problems need to be
> fixed. Complaining is not going to do that.
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss