deb diff for ubuntu
Mackenzie Morgan
macoafi at gmail.com
Wed Jan 7 14:59:19 UTC 2009
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 12:33 -0800, Joshuah Kuttenkuler wrote:
> But the files that are not changed are not included, since a user is
> guaranteed to have the original files.
No they're not. When you do a dist-upgrade, the newest package version
is installed. You thus miss all changes that occurred between your last
version and the newest. If you dist-upgrade on release day, you'll be
fine. If you dist-upgrade 2 months after release, you will have missed
maybe 5 updates in that time, so you'll end up with a half-updated and
probably not-working version of the program.
Now, in a dist-upgrade you're pretty much guaranteed there'll be a ton
of changes missed. Even in normal upgrade situations, if you're not
someone who updates daily, you could still have a problem. If you
update weekly or every 2 weeks and there were 2 updates released in that
time, you'll miss the first one.
--
Mackenzie Morgan
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com
apt-get moo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20090107/4c44faea/attachment.sig>
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list