We had a successful bug day, Thank you

[Matt Fischer]

+1 to monthly

On 01/18/2013 07:27 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Perhaps performing monthly?
>
>
> El 18/01/13 15:15, Walter Garcia-Fontes escribió:
>> * Omer Akram, oakram at gnome.org [18/01/13 14:59]:
>>> Now the question is what lies a head, I think now we should decide 
>>> when do
>>> we want to do our next bug day, which package we want to target and 
>>> suggest
>>> any improvements that could be made.
>> I think that ideally they should be weekly, but of course this can
>> cause attrition of the triagers. In any case if the group is large
>> enough even if there is some rotation it could work.
>>
>> As for packages they are easy to choose now that there haven't been hug
>> days for a while, I checked today "totem" for instance and there were
>> more than 100 "new" bugs.
>>
>> It's harder to come up with more imaginative lists, like "bugs without
>> a package" or similar, there is where more experienced triagers can
>> help. And these more targeted bugs sometimes are the easiest to triage.
>>
>> As for suggestions, I think we should also include "confirmed" bugs,
>> as a good amount of these are also untouched. I remember there used 
>> to be
>> two lists at the wiki page, one for new and the other one for
>> confirmed bugs. Of course it is useful to start with the new ones, but
>> a review of the confirmed bugs is also helpful.
>>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Matthew (Matt) Fischer
LP: http://launchpad.net/~mfisch
IRC: mfisch

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20130118/fab0e5fd/attachment.html>