<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">+1 to monthly On 01/18/2013 07:27 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:50F95BE5.7050102@gmail.com" type="cite">Perhaps performing monthly? El 18/01/13 15:15, Walter Garcia-Fontes escribió: <blockquote type="cite">* Omer Akram, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:oakram@gnome.org">oakram@gnome.org</a> [18/01/13 14:59]: <blockquote type="cite">Now the question is what lies a head, I think now we should decide when do we want to do our next bug day, which package we want to target and suggest any improvements that could be made. </blockquote> I think that ideally they should be weekly, but of course this can cause attrition of the triagers. In any case if the group is large enough even if there is some rotation it could work. As for packages they are easy to choose now that there haven't been hug days for a while, I checked today "totem" for instance and there were more than 100 "new" bugs. It's harder to come up with more imaginative lists, like "bugs without a package" or similar, there is where more experienced triagers can help. And these more targeted bugs sometimes are the easiest to triage. As for suggestions, I think we should also include "confirmed" bugs, as a good amount of these are also untouched. I remember there used to be two lists at the wiki page, one for new and the other one for confirmed bugs. Of course it is useful to start with the new ones, but a review of the confirmed bugs is also helpful. </blockquote> <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset> </blockquote> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- Matthew (Matt) Fischer LP: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://launchpad.net/~mfisch">http://launchpad.net/~mfisch</a> IRC: mfisch</pre> </body> </html>