Incomplete with no response >30 days

[Daniel Holbach]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Wolfger schrieb:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Henrik Nilsen Omma <henrik at canonical.com> wrote:
> 1) It forces triagers to use Firefox

Just for completeness' sake: it works with epiphany-browser (and
epiphany-extensions) too.


> 3) Triagers have to know about the script's existence.

In my reply to Brian's announce I added my thoughts about it too. It'd
be nice to have a ubuntu-qa-tools package, that'd depends on bughelper
and shipped all kinds of useful stuff (like greasemonkey scripts).

What do you think?


> It's an inherently flawed solution that misses the fact that some devs
> are using "incomplete" status in contradiction of the Ubuntu wiki
> definition. We could change the definition, I suppose, but that would
> make the status less useful in my opinion.

The answer I gave above does not solve the problem you mention and I
guess there will always be different contexts in which a bug status (or
a subscription/assignment, etc) will be interpreted differently.

We still should aim for bigger coherence though. Would it make sense to
discuss this at UDS? Who'd be interested in leading such a session?

Have a nice day,
 Daniel

- --
My 5 today: #225740 (wml), #227261 (phpmyadmin), #192517 (memtest86+),
#226999 (ubuntu), #227500 (libaudio-flac-header-perl)
Do 5 a day - every day! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/5-A-Day
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIIaRARjrlnQWd1esRAqq9AJ9eVem+YRQ/UbDZ0m7n9yGumeMJ2ACfdVlO
Xm9a532/CeKh6aBkE20s2QI=
=/wOO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----