[Ubuntu-BD] Ext3 or jfs

[dark lord]

I choose xfs but it says The grub boot loader installation often fails
or hangs when / boot is on a XFS file system.

On 11/23/08, Angel <fedora at linux.org.bd> wrote:
> Well. When I first heard about JFS. I did a little research on it on the
> net.
>
> Based on various sites forums and blogs, *XFS appears to be the most
> appropriate filesystem* to install on a file server for home or small
> business needs :
>
>    - It uses the maximum capacity of your server hard disk(s)
>    - It is the quickest FS to create, mount and unmount
>    - It is the quickest FS for operations on large files (>500MB)
>    - This FS gets a good second place for operations on a large number of
>    small to moderate-size files and directories
>    - It constitutes a good CPU vs time compromise for large directory
>    listing or file search
>    - It is not the least CPU demanding FS but its use of system ressources
>    is quite acceptable for older generation hardware
>
> While Linux Gazette Authors, *Justin Piszcz* did not explicitly recommand
> XFS, he concludes that "Personally, I still choose XFS for filesystem
> performance and scalability". I can only support this conclusion.
>
>
>
> Angel
> GPG key: 0xC4639705
> Bangladesh Linux Users Alliance
> Fedora Ambassador Bangladesh
> Fedora -- Freedom² and rapid innovation
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:19 PM, dark lord <darklord2007 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is there any advantage using jfs for linux not ext3?
>>
>> --
>> DARKLORD (:=
>>
>> --
>> ubuntu-bd mailing list
>> ubuntu-bd at lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
>>
> --
> ubuntu-bd mailing list
> ubuntu-bd at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
>


-- 
DARKLORD (:=