Leadership Structure

[bwright]

I think a very simple odd numbered comittiee of 3 to 5 people would be
the best system. It is simple it allows for effective work delegation
and it suits the nature of the community. These people would be openly
nominated for their work in the community and votes would be held. Any
sort of state delegation should be left for the LUGS we are really
just a community connected by the internet and we shouldn't try to
complicate things by over regulation.

On May 17, 10:16 pm, Matthew Rossi <m... at pcpodcast.org> wrote:
> Based on the IRC meeting, I'm starting another thread to discuss how the
> Ubuntu-AU LoCo can best structure leadership for the future.
> I ask that all who participate in this to please follow the CoC (ie be
> respectful of other people's opinions, provide constructive criticism etc),
> and to please not stall this process at any stage.  I encourage opinions
> that are not ego-centric and take the best interests of our community into
> consideration.
>
> The focal point of this thread will be a wiki page created which lists some
> suggestions of models that the LoCo could consider using.  You can find this
> athttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-au/council/structure
> --
> Regards,
> Matthew Rossi
> m... at pcpodcast.org
> Tel: +1 253 987 6413
> Mob: +61 488 122 990
>
> --
> ubuntu-au mailing list
> ubuntu... at lists.ubuntu.comhttps://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ubuntu-Au" group.
> To post to this group, send an email to ubuntu-au at googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ubuntu-au+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/ubuntu-au?hl=en-GB.