[ubuntu-art] Re: Quick Update

[Troy James Sobotka]

On Sun, 2006-25-06 at 19:21 +0200, Michiel Sikma wrote:

> I don't understand why it is so pertinently important to keep Human  
> in. In all objectivity, it's simply a suboptimal icon set when  
> compared to Tango. I also don't see why any of the arguments that I  
> have given have to be ignored.

Again, one man's meat is another man's poison.  There are 
no clear hard and fast rules in art.

The bottom line is that Human is the look.  The icons are heading
in that direction -- hence their name.

The default 'look' for Ubuntu is Human.  Period.  

If this is an unsurmountable issue to grasp for anyone, 
demonstrating a professional look alternative (with thumbnails
and a clear development breakdown and technological migration
path for example) it would go a lot further than debating
the matter on the mailing list. 

The issue is not up for debate.  It is, as Mark has said
on a number of issues, not a democracy.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/attachments/20060625/f3496652/attachment-0001.pgp