[ubuntu-art] Quick Update

[Michiel Sikma]

On Jun 25, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Troy James Sobotka wrote:

> This will require some new language.
>
> Basically, Human icons are in and staying -- as per sabdfl.
> This will be a component of the 'Human Look', which is what
> we are sticking with (albeit trying to finish it, polish it,
> and finish the set.)

I don't understand why it is so pertinently important to keep Human  
in. In all objectivity, it's simply a suboptimal icon set when  
compared to Tango. I also don't see why any of the arguments that I  
have given have to be ignored. Like I stated, Human doesn't seem to  
follow any proper guidelines at all. If it does, then I would like to  
read their rationale for arbitrarily designing some icons from  
different angles.

I've got the greatest respect for Mark, but I do not see his rationale.

Michiel Sikma
michiel at thingmajig.org