Flavor Review Request of UbuntuKylin

Scott Kitterman ubuntu at kitterman.com
Wed Feb 27 19:24:17 UTC 2013


On Monday, February 25, 2013 02:56:49 PM Martin Pitt wrote:
...
> fcitx vs. ibus:
>   * "it provides more efficient and intelligent input experience"
>     .. compared to what? ibus with sunpinyin/googlepinyin etc.? This
>     still doesn't describe how you want to fix the indicator,
>     control-center, language-selector etc. wrt. input configuration,
>     as they all assume ibus.
> 
>   * "it provides skin options and more developing input engines, such
>     as cloud-pinyin and google-pinyin"
> 
>     This suggests that fcitx also just uses the various Pinyin input
>     flavours, which ibus wraps as well?
...

In Kubuntu we've had requests to ship fcitx as well.  We've had feedback that 
it works better, but it currently supports a narrower range of languages, so I 
don't think it's suitable as a general Ibus replacement yet.  Of course Kylin 
has a narrow focus, so that's not an issue from their perspective.

Scott K



More information about the technical-board mailing list