Flavor Review Request of UbuntuKylin
Scott Kitterman
ubuntu at kitterman.com
Wed Feb 27 19:24:17 UTC 2013
On Monday, February 25, 2013 02:56:49 PM Martin Pitt wrote:
...
> fcitx vs. ibus:
> * "it provides more efficient and intelligent input experience"
> .. compared to what? ibus with sunpinyin/googlepinyin etc.? This
> still doesn't describe how you want to fix the indicator,
> control-center, language-selector etc. wrt. input configuration,
> as they all assume ibus.
>
> * "it provides skin options and more developing input engines, such
> as cloud-pinyin and google-pinyin"
>
> This suggests that fcitx also just uses the various Pinyin input
> flavours, which ibus wraps as well?
...
In Kubuntu we've had requests to ship fcitx as well. We've had feedback that
it works better, but it currently supports a narrower range of languages, so I
don't think it's suitable as a general Ibus replacement yet. Of course Kylin
has a narrow focus, so that's not an issue from their perspective.
Scott K
More information about the technical-board
mailing list