Windows Vista hardware requirements
Eric Feliksik
milouny at gmx.net
Tue Sep 13 10:32:09 CDT 2005
Daniel Stone wrote:
> (...) EXA will
> accelerate Composite just fine on i128 (Number #9 Imagine hardware),
> which was a joke in 1996, and is even worse now. Xgl doesn't have any
> onerous hardware requirements whatsoever, unless you want to run like
> seven videos all alpha-blended, in which case I'd posit that you need
> help anyway.
>
> So yeah, hardware requirements of that order would have to come from
> some apps with phenomenally heavy X requirements, not the mere presence
> of OpenGL-accelerated servers. We can do that on embarassingly low-end
> hardware just fine. :)
>
>
[This mail is about glx support]
I have a ProSavage8 video chip of which the hardware acceleration does
not work under Ubuntu by default. I saw the DRI people of
freedesktop.org working on a driver, but it was very unstable when I
tried (less than a year ago).
My point is: the stuff I read about the xorg-features are *way* cool,
but software acceleration often isn't enough. Can the features actually
be used freely? With what hardware? How is the state of free drivers for
OpenGL hardware in Linux-land at the moment? I know nvidia ships binary
drivers to get the hardware acceleration to work, but Ubuntu does not,
with good reasons IMO.
Thanks,
Eric
More information about the sounder
mailing list