No subject

KU is language itself and the suffix should be the geographical notation (As
it influences the locale).
KU_bakur
KU_ bashur
KU_rojhelat
KU_rojawa
Every notation should say what it stands for. If i look at CKB, i will think
of anything except of Kurdish.

Excuse me for this interruption. There is more discussion and time needed.

The frist writing system appeared in 2600 BC while the first text in Kurdish
is of around 1600's.
We waited 4000 years...we can wait another year to make this discussion
available for the simple souls.


My best regard,
Bardaqani
Kurditgroup.org

------=_Part_31284_22859664.1169714726367
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Dear Erdal / Dear friends,<br><br>(ckb (Sorani) are the same as for ku, nplural =2, plurals !=1. ) is unclear.<br>Sorry for being late to the discussion about CKB .<br>There is no such a thing like central Kurdish, even though its existence in :
<br><a href="http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=ckb">http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=ckb</a><br><br>if you speak about a sub language of a main family starting with Ku_ , would you start with letter C ? this will cause more separation. This is a disaster, nothing less. 
<br>There are some immature Kurdish linguists trying to impose the term Kurdi-Nawerast. <br>This will be same if you separate German spoken in the east and call it East-German and get a an ISO for it EGE (east_ge).<br><br>
What made Kurmanci to be KU only, and Sorani to be suffixed?<br>So Kurmanci = KU<br>Sorani = KU (Sorani/Latin), CKB, KU_SO<br><br>If this kind of logic will continue ... KU is Kurmanci and KU_SO, reading from this code is a sub of it.
<br><br>From my point of view:<br>KU is language itself and the suffix should be the geographical notation (As it influences the locale).<br>KU_bakur <br>KU_ bashur<br>KU_rojhelat<br>KU_rojawa<br>Every notation should say what it stands for. If i look at CKB, i will think of anything except of Kurdish.
<br><br>Excuse me for this interruption. There is more discussion and time needed.<br><br>The frist writing system appeared in 2600 BC while the first text in Kurdish is of around 1600&#39;s.<br>We waited 4000 years...we can wait another year to make this discussion available for the simple souls.
<br><br><br>My best regard,<br>Bardaqani<br><a href="http://Kurditgroup.org">Kurditgroup.org</a><br><br>

------=_Part_31284_22859664.1169714726367--