Proposal for upstream-rosetta priority problem

[Claude Paroz]

Le mardi 12 septembre 2006 à 19:07 +1200, Matthew Paul Thomas a écrit :
> Hi Claude
> 
> On Sep 9, 2006, at 8:20 PM, Claude Paroz wrote:
> > ...
> > Maybe Rosetta devs are already working on a solution, but I would
> > propose the following:
> >
> > 1. Add a new filter in the Show drop-down: "Changed from upstream"
> 
> This idea was reported in February. <https://launchpad.net/bugs/32471>

Oh sorry. Thanks for pointing it.

> > 2. In the "single-string" page, highlight the last upstream translation
> > in the suggestions (using the same green colour as in status bars would
> > be nice). Add a button "Revert to upstream" that put back the original
> > upstream translation in place.
> > It's important to note that manually copying the upstream translation
> > has not the same effect, because if a modification is done upstream
> > later, it won't automatically replace the manually added string.
> >
> > Alternatively, you could prevent adding this new button if the system
> > automatically recognizes that when I manually add a string identical to
> > upstream one, the string resynchronizes with upstream, that is the
> > "Translated by" field shows upstream data (translator and date) and the
> > string is marked unchanged in Rosetta (green colour).
> > ...
> 
> Reported this now. <https://launchpad.net/bugs/60029>

Thanks, Matthew. Let's hope it won't stay as wishlist forever ;-)
Regards.

Claude