Proposal for upstream-rosetta priority problem

Matthew Paul Thomas mpt at canonical.com
Tue Sep 12 08:07:50 BST 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Claude

On Sep 9, 2006, at 8:20 PM, Claude Paroz wrote:
> ...
> Maybe Rosetta devs are already working on a solution, but I would
> propose the following:
>
> 1. Add a new filter in the Show drop-down: "Changed from upstream"

This idea was reported in February. <https://launchpad.net/bugs/32471>

> 2. In the "single-string" page, highlight the last upstream translation
> in the suggestions (using the same green colour as in status bars would
> be nice). Add a button "Revert to upstream" that put back the original
> upstream translation in place.
> It's important to note that manually copying the upstream translation
> has not the same effect, because if a modification is done upstream
> later, it won't automatically replace the manually added string.
>
> Alternatively, you could prevent adding this new button if the system
> automatically recognizes that when I manually add a string identical to
> upstream one, the string resynchronizes with upstream, that is the
> "Translated by" field shows upstream data (translator and date) and the
> string is marked unchanged in Rosetta (green colour).
> ...

Reported this now. <https://launchpad.net/bugs/60029>

Thanks for your ideas!

Cheers
- --
Matthew Paul Thomas
http://mpt.net.nz/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFBlzL6PUxNfU6ecoRAteqAKDPH2Vi/i6j2DwMh4nl0WXbxMgragCgx9tf
OssqN6fy60Qf1BYJLn6xnu8=
=+raT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the rosetta-users mailing list