MOTU application for Alessio Treglia (quadrispro)
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
pochu at ubuntu.com
Tue Jan 20 00:36:20 GMT 2009
Luca Falavigna wrote:
> James Westby ha scritto:
>> The first was https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317682. There was
>> absolutely nothing wrong with the merge as far as I could see. However,
>> I asked some questions when I saw it. For instance, do we need to
>> remove that documentation in Ubuntu? Would it be better to minimise
>> the diff to Debian, or keep the documentation for our users? Is it
>> worth spending time on merging that change?
>
> IIRC, Ubuntu considers GFDL free while Debian has some concerns about
> it. I didn't look at debian-legal to see the real issue with GFDL, so I
> could be wrong here.
That's right, invariant sections in the GFDL are non DFSG-compliant, per
http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
But not every documentation licensed under the GFDL has invariant sections.
Cheers,
Emilio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/motu-council/attachments/20090120/2c4420b4/attachment.pgp
More information about the Motu-council
mailing list