Xubuntu reverting to non-pae kernel?

[Julien Lavergne]

I saw it also, and still thinking about it. My point to keep pae by default was because nobody else done the same. I didn't want to maintain this exception only for us, and to give work to people only for this.

Since Xubuntu switch to non-pae by default, and the change to do it for us is very small, I am starting to think that we should do the same. Or, I can't see any point to not switch to non-pae by default.

Julien Lavergne

Le 17 mars 2012 à 13:33, Lance <lbsolost at yahoo.com> a écrit :

> I posted a couple of links here:
> 
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=11772755&postcount=1
> 
> If it's true I wonder if Lubuntu shouldn't do likewise. I personally think it makes sense since one of our target markets is low resource hardware.
> 
> Maybe someone could ask Colin Watson's opinion?
> -- 
> Lubuntu-users mailing list
> Lubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/lubuntu-users/attachments/20120317/703da7e2/attachment.html>