Xubuntu reverting to non-pae kernel?

[Phill Whiteside]

I think it would sense for us also, those with > 3.2GB RAM can always add
PAE if they so wish.

Regards,

Phill.

On 17 March 2012 14:13, Julien Lavergne <gilir at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> I saw it also, and still thinking about it. My point to keep pae by
> default was because nobody else done the same. I didn't want to maintain
> this exception only for us, and to give work to people only for this.
>
> Since Xubuntu switch to non-pae by default, and the change to do it for us
> is very small, I am starting to think that we should do the same. Or, I
> can't see any point to not switch to non-pae by default.
>
> Julien Lavergne
>
> Le 17 mars 2012 à 13:33, Lance <lbsolost at yahoo.com> a écrit :
>
> I posted a couple of links here:
>
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=11772755&postcount=1
>
> If it's true I wonder if Lubuntu shouldn't do likewise. I personally think
> it makes sense since one of our target markets is low resource hardware.
>
> Maybe someone could ask Colin Watson's opinion?
>
> --
> Lubuntu-users mailing list
> Lubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
>
>
> --
> Lubuntu-users mailing list
> Lubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
>
> --
> <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/lubuntu-users/attachments/20120317/0a6bd850/attachment.html>