<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>I saw it also, and still thinking about it. My point to keep pae by default was because nobody else done the same. I didn't want to maintain this exception only for us, and to give work to people only for this.</div><div><br></div><div>Since Xubuntu switch to non-pae by default, and the change to do it for us is very small, I am starting to think that we should do the same. Or, I can't see any point to not switch to non-pae by default.<br><br>Julien Lavergne</div><div><br>Le 17 mars 2012 à 13:33, Lance <<a href="mailto:lbsolost@yahoo.com">lbsolost@yahoo.com</a>> a écrit :<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">I posted a couple of links here:<br><br><a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=11772755&postcount=1">http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=11772755&postcount=1</a><br><br>If it's true I wonder if Lubuntu shouldn't do likewise. I personally think it makes sense since one of our target markets is low resource hardware.<br><br>Maybe someone could ask Colin Watson's opinion?<br></td></tr></tbody></table></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>-- </span><br><span>Lubuntu-users mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com">Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com</a></span><br><span>Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>