Re-approvals for O-Cycle rules and overview
Paul Tagliamonte
paultag at ubuntu.com
Wed May 18 18:18:18 UTC 2011
Forgot to mention this (Thanks, Lyz!)
If you need more information regarding the re-approval process, it's
mostly outlined on the wiki[1]. If you need moreinfo or anything like
that, please don't think twice about letting us know how we can help.
[1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncil/LoCoTeamReApproval
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Paul Tagliamonte <paultag at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Good time of day, LoCo Teams!
>
> It's the time of year again! Re-approval time, so it's time dust off
> the team photos and fire out some wiki edits!
>
> We have a *ton* of teams to review this year, so we have some ground
> rules that need to be adhered to very closely. We really hate (and we
> do) to be such a pedantic nit-picker, but it's to the point where we
> can't (as the LoCo Council) slip on reviewing teams. Not good for you,
> not good for us.
>
> All you team administrators have been subscribed to the LP bug, if you
> are the contact (and not the admin), please contact your local
> friendly admin (or one of us on the LoCo Council) to get subscribed.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> * If the application is submitted before the release of Ubuntu
> Oneiric, we will consider it. If it failes to come in on time,
> we *will* have to throw it away. We're serious about this one.
>
> * We're looking for a few key things in particular this cycle. We
> really want to see up-to-date Team Reports. It's really something
> that needs to be enforced. We're also looking (as usual) for
> outstanding and sustained levels of activity.
>
> * The sooner, the better! We really need to make sure we get to
> everyone in a sane way, and that means that we're processing about
> 2 applications a week. That's manageable, but not if everyone gets
> them in the month before release.
>
> * By the way, we love you guys. We know you guys have
> done awesome work so far, and we can't wait to see it! :)
>
> Let's get those apps in!
>
> Keep rocking!
> Paul Tagliamonte
> On Behalf of the LoCo Council
>
> P.S.
> No extensions. We mean it!
>
> --
> All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.
>
> #define sizeof(x) rand()
> :wq
>
Thanks!
Paul
--
All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.
#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq
More information about the loco-contacts
mailing list