State of Konqueror ?

[Richard]

On Thursday 17 January 2008 3:17:25 pm Jared Greenwald wrote:
> > second, Firefox has more customization via plug-in extensions to really
> > kick it to the next level. (hmmm, it would be nice) it Konqueror could do
> > that, then we would truly have it all... just a note firefox 3 browser is
> > way faster than firefox 2.x.11 way faster.. and less memory.
>
> Not that I'm defending Konqeror at all (I'm a Firefox user), but there
> is an extensions framework for Konqueror, but I just think that hardly
> anyone has written any plugins for it.  (Check under "Settings" ->
> "Configure Extensions")  I think the only one at the moment is a
> text-to-speech accessibility extension that is installed by default.
> I wouldn't even know where to look for new extensions, but the
> framework is there to support them.
>
> -Jared

Hey Jared,
well , as of late, I'm using firefox,
but I do miss using konqueror for all, it just work
as I have stated, in my previous email to the group,
if Konqueror had the option as of firefox would you use
firefox ? probably not.

Rich