new linux-image: why?
trygvebw at gmail.com
Mon Jun 13 07:14:08 CDT 2005
Standard "Athlon" processors are as far as i know K7s (but K7s are 686s too
;) but the "Athlon XP" processors are standard Pentium III-compitable
On 6/13/05, Donatas G. <ziogelis77 at takas.lt> wrote:
> 2005 m. Birželio 13 d., Pirmadienis 04:05, Alexander Antoniades rašė:
> > I'm unclear on this, isn't k7 the 32 bit Athlon family of chips (like
> > his 1800+) and K8 is the AMD 64 family of chips?
> > I was looking for some information on this, but it indeed show that
> > only the very first Athlon is called k7, but the first 64 bit chip is
> > called K8, implying the the previous chips are all one generation.
> > Without getting into some whole source v binary debate, is getting the
> > 686 (which presumably is optimized for a Pentium 2) any better than
> > the plain 386 binary?
> > Thanks for you help,
> > Sander
> Well, good question...
> I updated to 686 binary yesterday... Everything works fine (had to
> the fglrx binary and also install linux-restricted... package for it to
> work), and I would love to think - also faster :) Though it is just a
> I don't know about the processors, though. KDE in Kcontrol tells me I have
> 686 processor, though I don't know if I should believe that.
> Donatas Glodenis
> kubuntu-users mailing list
> kubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the kubuntu-users